Nice Ranger. It looks like a 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011.
rofl rofl rofl
Nice Ranger. It looks like a 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011.
Nice Ranger. It looks like a 1998,1999,2000,2001,2002,2003,2004,2005,2006,2007,2008,2009,2010,2011.

.
Now you just need some lockers and t-case gears and you're set.
Yep. My wife starts a new job on the 25th. Hopefully this winter I'll have some "spare" cash for some gears, locker, and dropping an RV cam into my 22RE. I'm also looking at the MSD add on. I ran one on my Ford I6 and it made a good difference for low end smoothness and power.
If you stick a 4.7 gear set in the transfer case you'll have more torque than you will know what to do with, I'd leave the diff gears alone untill you break one and just get some lunchbox lockers F/R and flat belly it with a transfer case clocking kit.
Must use some Google... I'll get back to you on that. As for the gear set swap - I'll loose my upper end won't I? I'm still trying to keep it streetable for now.
Transfer case gears
http://www.trail-gear.com/transfer-case-gears
Clocking my not be the best option but rather the drive train lift that rob did as it seems inchworm has discontinued their single case clocking ring.
As for the diff gears if you're not going to drive it on the street a lot then IMO they are somewhat of a waste of money as they mostly make it more streetable you'll have plenty on the low end with stock gears but be struggling to do 70.
Pulling in reverse will help you regear sooner![]()
There is no drawback, toyota should have built them like that from the get goSo my low range double down and goes to 4.7:1 and my high range stays 1:1? What is the draw back?
R&P gears have a drive and a coast side with the drive side being stronger, they designed so that when moving forward the gears are meshing on the drive side, in reverse they are meshing on the coast side and the gears become significantly weaker.I know I've seen/done it both ways. Is there really a "golden" rule to it?
There is no drawback, toyota should have built them like that from the get go
R&P gears have a drive and a coast side with the drive side being stronger, they designed so that when moving forward the gears are meshing on the drive side, in reverse they are meshing on the coast side and the gears become significantly weaker.

So my low range double down and goes to 4.7:1 and my high range stays 1:1? What is the draw back?
The draw back is that you can only do 15mph in 4LO instead of 30-40. Not really that big of a deal unless you go to the beach alot. I like to put it in 4 lo so I don't put as much wear on the tranny and engine, but having to keep it at 15mph would kinda suck ass.